Most staffing arrangements end at the introduction. A profile is matched to a requirement, an invoice starts, and from that point the gap between the person on your floor and the firm that sent them is your problem to manage.
You get something different here: people who have done the work before, who embed with your team, and who stay answerable for what they deliver while they are with you.
A name on a contract is easy. People who own the outcome are not.
Not body-shopping
The familiar pattern is volume placement — a CV that reads better than the person, a notice period that arrives the week a release is due, and a vendor who has already moved on to the next slot. You absorb the ramp-up cost, the knowledge that walks out the door, and the quiet drag on the people who stay.
The work here goes the other way: fewer people, each one stood behind. If someone is not right for the work, that is ours to put right — not a line item you negotiate after the fact.
People who have done the work
The people put forward have delivered the kind of system you are running, in conditions close to yours — not the nearest available match. That means an engineer who has carried an ERP rollout past go-live, or a developer who has maintained software under real production load, rather than someone learning your problem on your time.
Because these are systems we also build and run, we know what a capable hire looks like on this kind of work, and we screen for it before a name reaches you.
- Individuals to fill a defined gap, or a small team brought in together
- People assessed on the work itself, not only on a conversation
- Cover across the systems your operation depends on day to day
Embedded, accountable, and able to flex
Our people work inside your team — your standups, your tools, your definition of done — so they are contributing rather than orienting. You set the direction; we stay responsible for the standard of the work and for raising a problem early, instead of letting it surface in a release.
When you need to flex capacity, you can scale up for a delivery push and down once it lands without resetting context each time. The people who already know your systems stay close to them, so continuity holds even as the headcount moves.
Tell us the gap you are trying to close and the deadline it sits against, and we will be straight about who we can field, when, and on what terms — including where a short engagement to scope the work first would serve you better than a long commitment.
Selected work
People who embedded with a team and stayed accountable for the outcome — not body-shopping:
-
An ERP consultant who stayed past the go-live
A manufacturer’s in-house team was stretched thin by the time the new ERP went…
Read the case study : An ERP consultant who stayed past the go-live -
An integration engineer for the TMS-to-ERP build
A logistics business needed a TMS, WMS and ERP to talk to each other…
Read the case study : An integration engineer for the TMS-to-ERP build -
A data engineer embedded for the reporting build
A finance team could not trust its own numbers because the reporting was held…
Read the case study : A data engineer embedded for the reporting build -
A security-minded DevOps engineer to harden delivery
A software firm shipped well but loosely, and it was starting to show. We…
Read the case study : A security-minded DevOps engineer to harden delivery -
Replacing a body-shop contract that had stopped working
A client had been sold five contractors and got churn, mismatched skills and no…
Read the case study : Replacing a body-shop contract that had stopped working -
Covering a migration crunch without carrying the headcount
A services firm faced a platform migration that needed more people for a few…
Read the case study : Covering a migration crunch without carrying the headcount -
A small squad for the push, scaled down once it landed
A product company needed more hands for one delivery push, not a permanent larger…
Read the case study : A small squad for the push, scaled down once it landed -
QA capacity for a release the team could not cover alone
A team facing a significant release had no way to test it properly with…
Read the case study : QA capacity for a release the team could not cover alone -
Holding a retailer’s systems through peak trading
A retailer’s IT team could not safely cover its busiest trading weeks alone. We…
Read the case study : Holding a retailer’s systems through peak trading -
When the people we placed joined the client’s payroll
A client’s embedded team came to know its systems so well that, when the…
Read the case study : When the people we placed joined the client’s payroll
Related reading: staff augmentation vs managed services vs hiring.